← Toolve / Recordable

Recordable or not?

A decision tool for 29 CFR 1904. Answer the questions below and get a call you can defend to an inspector — with the citation behind each reason, whether it is a privacy-concern case, and what has to go on the 300 and 301. Nothing is uploaded; no account, no logs.

1. Did the event or exposure happen in the work environment — or did work activity significantly aggravate a pre-existing condition?
29 CFR 1904.5(a). If it did not occur in the work environment and was not significantly aggravated by work, stop here: not work-related.
2. Does one of the 1904.5(b)(2) exceptions apply?
These are explicitly not work-related even if they happen at work.
3. What was the outcome? Tick everything that applies.
29 CFR 1904.7(a) general recording criteria, plus the special rules in 1904.8–1904.11.
4. Is it a privacy-concern case?
1904.29(b)(7) — you still record it, but you do not put the name on the 300 (enter "privacy case" and keep a separate confidential list).
Answer question 1 to begin
The call appears here as you answer.

What "first aid only" means — the list that keeps cases off the log

Full breakdown with the traps: first aid vs medical treatment.

29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5)(ii) defines first aid as any one-time, non-prescription treatment of a minor injury, including:

First aid (not recordable on its own)Medical treatment (recordable)
Non-prescription medication at non-prescription strength; tetanus shot; cleaning, flushing or soaking minor wounds; butterfly bandages or Steri-Strips; hot or cold therapy; non-rigid supports; temporary immobilisation; drilling a fingernail or draining a blister; eye patches; removing a foreign body from the eye with irrigation or a cotton swab; removing splinters with tweezers; finger guards; massage; drinking fluids for heat stressPrescription medication, stitches or surgical glue, wound closure, physical therapy, breathing treatments, casting, surgery, chiropractic adjustment, IV fluids, and any treatment a physician directs beyond the first-aid list
The trap most people miss: "medical treatment beyond first aid" is the criterion, not "the person saw a doctor". A visit that ends with an ice pack and a bandage is still first aid; a visit that ends with a prescription is recordable even if the employee returns to work the same hour.

Special rules that override the general criteria

After you record: 300 vs 301

Field-by-field: the 300 log and the 301 report.

Not legal advice. Federal OSHA rules are described here; roughly half the states run OSHA-approved State Plans that must be at least as effective but may differ in detail, coverage and deadlines. For a specific case, the determination belongs to the employer with the regulation in hand — or to the inspector.

More on recordkeeping: first aid vs medical treatment · 300 log & 301 · reporting deadlines · do I need a 300 log
Toolve · All pages · Privacy · Contact

Basis & sources

Primary sources only — the statute, form or paper this page is built on.

Last reviewed 2026-10-26 · Report a correction